Just the Facts of Life Now
Pornography is so common in the
Digital Age that teens see it as 'part of the culture.'
Mike Clark figures he was just a little kid
when he saw his first sexy pop-up ad on the Internet, and somewhat older
when he saw his first sexy pop-up that he understood. First X-rated spam?
Let's see � when did he first learn to use e-mail? First videogame with sexy
images? Probably the first time he played Grand Theft Auto. First glimpse of
an online porn site?
"Right after my first sex ed class in seventh grade," the peach-fuzzed
Orange County 16-year-old confessed one recent Saturday as his buddies burst
out laughing.
"I mean, the minute they tell you that stuff is out there, you're like,
'Really? It is?' "
And it is, his peers confirmed, shouting over music during a lunch break at
a conference of a teen service organization in Irvine. It's online, on
cable, on cellphone cameras, in chat rooms, in instant messages from freaks
who go online and trawl children's Web journals, on cam-to-cam Web hookups,
on TV screens at parties where teens walk past it as if it were wallpaper,
in lectures about abstinence in Sunday school and in health class, in
movies, in hip-hop lyrics like the one blaring from the loudspeaker as they
lined up for pizza and burritos.
"Pornography," shrugged Scott Timsit, a dark-haired 16-year-old in
wire-rimmed glasses, "is just part of the culture now. It's almost like it's
not even, like, porn."
The first generation to grow up with the Internet and all it has wrought in
the cultural mainstream is beginning to come of age. It is a generation for
whom 900 numbers and scrambled scraps of flesh on the Spice channel have
given way, in a few short years, to bulk e-mail ads for the Paris Hilton sex
tapes and porn subplots on "The O.C." It is a generation in which sexual
frankness has become a permanent feature of the landscape, with uncertain
long-term implications.
By definition, pornography is sexual material that is so beyond the pale as
to be offensive for most people, said Gilbert Herdt, director of the
National Sexuality Resource Center, a Ford Foundation-funded project in San
Francisco. But as the Internet has made more extreme images more accessible
to more people at younger ages, standards have shifted in other media
outlets.
"What we once called porn is just mainstream sex now, and what we now think
of as pornography has shrunk to a tiny, tiny area," Herdt said. "We've
expanded the envelope of normative sex so much that there's not much room
for 'porn' anymore."
X Loses Its Shock Value
Sex, of course, has always sold in American culture. And hand wringing about
children's exposure to it is as old as civilization. But never has adult
content had a platform as powerful � and legitimizing � as the one-two punch
of cable plus the Internet.
Images and subject matter that were stigmatized a generation ago now flow
and multiply from one mass medium to another, turning yesterday's taboo into
today's in-joke. Adult film actress Jenna Jameson has moved from X-rated
DVDs and downloads to the bestselling sex manual "How to Make Love Like a
Porn Star" and, last year, a VH1 documentary. Dance moves once associated
with strippers are as common on MTV as tight pants on rock stars. Pamela
Anderson and Paris Hilton are famous equally for their TV work and their
downloadable bootleg sex tapes.
What this has meant for children has been a massive spillover of sexually
charged content into the mainstream. Patricia Greenfield, director of the
Children's Digital Media Center at UCLA, calls it "an all-pervasive
sexualized media environment" that now throws sex at kids even when they
aren't looking for it and hits them at an ever younger age.
Grade-schoolers doing their homework on the family computer, for example,
now routinely start by deleting spam for impotence drugs from their e-mail.
Middle school students clandestinely trade copies of such adult-rated
videogames as "Playboy: The Mansion." Teen advice columns offer wisdom on
porn addiction. Online chat rooms for adolescents lapse in and out of
graphic sex talk. One TV ad for male body spray depicts a young teenage boy
fending off the sexual advances of his date's middle-age mother.
On *******.com, an online site popular with teenagers and middle school
children � and one that expressly forbids explicit postings and
participation by people younger than 16 � teens inventing new screen names
can nonetheless access an automated "name generator" whose ad offers, among
other things, to come up with monikers for their genitalia and to answer the
playful question, "What's your porn star name?"
Whether so much sex talk distorts children's views is only beginning to be
researched. Dr. Lynn Ponton, a professor of psychiatry at UC San Francisco
and author of "The Sex Lives of Teenagers," notes that exploring sexuality
is an important part of a healthy adolescence, but the usual outlets for
that aren't what they used to be.
One study by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation found, for example, that
70% of the nation's 15- to 17-year-olds have looked at pornography online.
But an average porn site can generate as many sexual images in a minute as
an entire issue of Hustler, Ponton said, and often they are exponentially
more violent and explicit than the centerfolds that past generations used to
stash under the mattress.
"If you see images of women being tied up and degraded, and you're seeing
them year after year and by the thousands, it desensitizes you," Ponton
said. "And this has not yet been looked at developmentally."
"Young people don't have a lot of reference points," agreed Ralph DiClemente,
professor of public health and medicine at Atlanta's Emory University, who
is midway through a five-year study of children and the Internet sponsored
by the National Institute of Mental Health. "For them, the media is
reality."
"So, you're a young person, you're curious, you haven't had sex but you
don't want to appear to be a neophyte. What do you do? You go on the
Internet to see, how should I behave? And a lot of what they're getting is a
stilted perception of reality."
Whether that perception translates into behavior, however, is another
question. Most children, after all, tune out what they don't understand. And
for all the sex in their sightlines, teenagers now have the lowest
pregnancy, birth and abortion rates in decades. The vast majority of
adolescents still are virgins at age 15, and the federal Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention reported in 2002 that the size of that majority had
increased since 1995. In a recent poll by Princeton Survey Research
Associates commissioned by People magazine and NBC, 95% of 13- and
14-year-olds said they had not had intercourse, and 9 out of 10 said they
disapproved of it for those their age.
"Adults always think kids today are worse, or more sexual or more
promiscuous, " said Mike Males, a lecturer in sociology at UC Santa Cruz and
the author of "Framing Youth: Ten Myths About the Next Generation." "But
most of the measures of that are at all-time lows.
"So then we get into these weird assertions that their attitudes are just
worse somehow, and when it comes to attitudes, I'm very suspicious of adult
perception and motives. It's as if adults were trying to say, we're better,
we're more moral, we're superior."
Mixed Messages
At the youth conference in Irvine, teens talked of feeling pushed and pulled
by the forces of sexualization and morality.
As a DJ raffled off snowboards and Volcom clothing on the City Hall lawn,
half a dozen girls sat in a circle, chatting and cheering and periodically
interrupting themselves midsentence to rock out to some particularly
compelling backbeat. Asked whether Internet pornography and sexually charged
cable content had influenced the messages they got from the larger culture,
they exploded.
"For one thing, it causes girls to think they need makeovers," said Kirstin
Williams, a 15-year-old blond in sweatpants and a hoodie. "Like, I know
people who are considering plastic surgery."
"You're supposed to have skinny thighs, big [breasts], flat stomachs," said
Amy Liu, 14, brushing her long, dark hair behind one ear. "But then if
you're fortunate to have that kind of body naturally, then they call you
anorexic�. You can't win."
Across the lawn, a table of boys explained that girls weren't the only
confused ones.
"You get the message that that kind of sex is glamorous, that you should be
with these skinny blond types," said Timsit.
"And that sex should be unemotional," said Brad Spitzer, 17, wolfing down a
plate of El Pollo Loco. "But then my mother gave me, like, this moral talk
about how porn is all immoral."
Others said their main complaint about porn was that their parents
continually accused them of downloading it when they were in fact indulging
their real passion: playing gory online computer games.
What, though, of the unsettling exceptions? Take the recent Newport Beach
date rape trial in which three boys filmed themselves sexually assaulting an
apparently unconscious female friend. Or the sex video that was made and
disseminated last year by teens at an upscale Scarsdale, N.Y., high school.
Or the student-made sex DVD that two years ago rocked the private Milken
Community High School in Los Angeles.
"I was sick," recalled Milken's head of school, Rennie Wrubel. Parents had
reported that their child had been shown the homemade DVD by a classmate on
a library computer at the Jewish day school. "Sick over the kids because I
cared for them, sick because I wanted them to care more about themselves."
The children � two boys and a girl who were then in 10th and 11th grade �
were expelled, and the event set off weeks of anguished soul searching on
and off campus. The school called in mental health specialists, held
marathon meetings and coffees, sponsored seminars for parents and children
on the responsible use of the Internet. But it soon became clear, she said,
that the incident was far more about the particular children than their
cultural influences.
"There really was no link to anything larger," said Wrubel, who stayed in
touch with two of the three after they changed schools and followed their
redemption proudly as they embarked on a community service project in which
they're still engaged.
"They were just being inappropriate and experimenting, and they had their
own issues. This is a tough age."
Many young people say their parents would be less shocked by the current
landscape if they realized how much the extreme end of the spectrum has
changed. For example, porn as they know it now, they say, makes
"*************," the groundbreaking 1972 X-rated film, look tame. It lacks
even the pretense of a plot, and much of it is in short, brutal bursts whose
harshness then seeps into their language, fashion and postures.
"In a lot of these films, the camera itself is violent," said Shade Remelin,
a 22-year-old Laguna Beach filmmaker who, as a film student at UC Santa
Barbara, once wrote a 15-page letter in hope of persuading a professor who'd
included porn in a film class there to talk less about the aesthetics of the
genre and more about its misogyny.
That said, much of the extreme content being produced now is also a product
of this generation, and, more important, its history, notes Santa Monica
attorney Jeffrey J. Douglas, board chairman of the Free Speech Coalition, a
trade association for the adult industry. Before the Internet, he said,
mail-order erotica was far less accessible and most sexually explicit
material was sold by merchants who feared criminal prosecution and local
sanctions. But with the rise of the World Wide Web, which opened the door
for a flood of cheap content � much of it made outside U.S. jurisdiction �
any inclination to self-censor went the way of the corner adult bookstore.
"A lot of the domestic content producers now literally came of age in an era
in which there were no federal prosecutions," said Douglas. Four years ago,
he said, he got into a conversation about a 1987 obscenity prosecution with
a 20-year-old who had made a medium-size fortune producing explicit material
online.
"The guy looked at me and said, 'Do you know how old I was in 1987?' It was
like I was talking about the Spanish-American War."
With that sort of shift at the margins, teens say, shock value simply isn't
what it used to be. The disconnect was on display recently at an Orange
County movie theater where the documentary "*************" was playing. The
audience was overwhelmingly middle-age. Though it was a Saturday at a mall,
not a young person was in sight and not one adolescent lurked near the
forbidden NC-17 doorway. Not even Ben Meredith, the 18-year-old popcorn
jockey, had bothered to check out the action.
"I mean, porn is really easy to get now," the UC Irvine freshman shrugged,
tossing his long bangs, which were dyed blood-orange. "It's like, who
cares?"
X-rated images, he said, were "like cigarettes, which everybody can get if
they want them." They were as accessible as a cellphone ring tone or an
addition to the playlist for your iPod.
"Porn," he said, sticking a plastic cup under the soft drink dispenser, "is
just another form of entertainment now."
By Shawn Hubler, Times Staff Writer, April
23, 2005
Article licensing and reprint options
http://www.latimes.com/copyright
origin: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/columnone/la-et-genporn23apr23,1,620096.story?coll=la-headlines-columnone&ctrack=1&cset=true
SimpleToRemember.com - Judaism Online |